George Galloway’s Victory against the Red Wall and Blue Wall, but not the Zionist Wall

George Galloway’s resurgence in British politics with a resounding win in the Rochdale byelection has ignited both celebration and apprehension across the political spectrum. His emphatic victory, marked by a campaign centred around the Gaza war, underscores the potency of emotive issues in local elections and the enduring influence of grassroots activism. 

Securing an impressive 12,335 votes, Galloway’s triumph surpassed all other candidates by a significant margin, echoing sentiments of solidarity with Gaza and criticism of mainstream political stances. His return to Parliament sends a powerful message to the traditional political establishment.

However, while the red wall of Labour and the blue bastion of the Conservatives might have appeared conquerable in a local by-election, the true barrier for Galloway is the entrenched support for Zionist interests within the corridors of power. 

The Prime Minister’s immediate response underscores this tension. Describing the result as “beyond alarming,” he cautioned against “extremist forces” attempting to sow division. It’s a clear indication that Galloway’s entry into Parliament will not go unopposed, particularly by those aligned with the Zionists and vested interests. 

The real challenge for Galloway begins now, as he steps into the heart of “British democracy”. His victory will face formidable opposition. The Zionist support network, deeply entrenched within mainstream politics, represents a formidable force that has historically stifled dissenting voices on matters concerning the oppression of Gaza. 

Predictably, the response to Galloway’s victory will follow a familiar pattern. The narrative of anti-Semitism will be wielded as a weapon, with attempts to discredit his character and tarnish his reputation. Accusations of being a threat to democracy will echo through the halls of Westminster, as the establishment grapples with the disruption caused by Galloway’s unapologetic approach to Westminster. 

It’s wishful thinking to believe that Galloway can catalyse significant change regarding Gaza. He joins a line of individuals who have attempted to challenge the entrenched influence of Zionism within Westminster, only to be met with resistance and failure. To have hope is part of the Islamic belief, but to have blind hope is of no avail to us. In Islam, hope is intertwined with action and righteousness. It necessitates proactive engagement and informed decision-making, rather than passive reliance on promises or symbols. Galloway’s victory may symbolise a beacon of hope for many Muslims, yet this hope must be grounded in a realistic assessment of political dynamics and the heart of the Zionist agenda. Blind hope risks disappointment and disillusionment, highlighting the importance of critical thinking and constructive engagement in pursuit of meaningful change.

The establishment staunchly upholds the Zionist agenda as non-negotiable, making any meaningful discourse on the matter challenging. Moreover, the indiscriminate labelling of criticism as anti-Semitism has effectively stifled legitimate dialogue and dissent. This fear of being labelled has created a political landscape where genuine criticism of the Zionist entity is suppressed, relegating important conversations to the politics of Pigeonholing rather than any substantive discourse. 

Muslims undoubtedly will be filled with hope in Galloway’s victory, seeing in him a champion for the Gaza cause. His unwavering stance against Zionist aggression resonates deeply within Muslim communities, igniting a sense of solidarity and support. Yet, history offers cautionary tales, such as the challenges faced by Corbyn and Muslim MPs within mainstream parties, where their efforts often met resistance or were overshadowed by party dynamics. The SNP vote, too, serves as a reminder of how political drama can divert attention from crucial issues. While hope is integral to Islamic belief, blind optimism risks disillusionment. 

Muslims must anchor their hope in the promise of Allah, particularly as the blessed month of Ramadan approaches. Ramadan holds profound significance in Islamic history, notably marked by the liberation of the blessed land (al-Quds) by Salahuddin Ayubi. It stands as a testament to the potential for divine intervention and victory during this holy month. As Muslims prepare for Ramadan, it’s imperative to continue invoking Allah’s guidance and assistance. While international institutions and Muslim rulers’ pressure have failed the people of Gaza, there remains a potent source of hope in the mobilisation of Muslim armies. The month of Ramadan, with its emphasis on Iman, Taqwa and solidarity, presents an opportune moment to renew calls for military intervention by Muslim armies to liberate Palestine. It is believed that the fervour and unity of Ramadan could inspire Muslim armies to break ranks with their compromised leaderships and take decisive action. 

The likelihood of achieving liberation does not hinge on parliamentary votes for a ceasefire but rather on the resolute determination of Muslim Armies to uphold justice and righteousness, echoing the spirit of Salahuddin’s noble conquest.